Farmers Still Without Clarity on True Cost & Practical Implications of Nature Restoration Regulation

IFA Environment & Rural Affairs Chair John Murphy said that the true financial and practical implications of nature restoration remain unknown, without clarity on the role of the State and what will be required of farmers.

He was reacting to the publication of the Independent Advisory Council on Nature Restoration recommendations report today.

“We are still very much in the dark, with no clear understanding of what is being asked of us or how it will be funded,” he said.

“There is a lack of clarity on what is actually being asked of farmers, and critically, how it will be funded. There was a clear expectation when the regulation was passed in 2024 that the Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund would support nature restoration. That funding has since been diverted, which has seriously undermined confidence.”

He questioned the widely referenced €700m per year figure for restoration costs, describing it as a headline estimate rather than a detailed assessment based on actual measures.

“This is very much a headline figure. Without a detailed plan setting out the specific restoration measures required; the extent of public land being used to meet targets; and the actual asks of farmers, it is impossible to determine the true cost.”

He said farmers consistently hear that the benefits of supporting nature restoration significantly outweigh the costs, yet we find ourselves in an all too familiar position just five months out from submitting Ireland’s draft Nature Restoration Plan with no budget.

“If farmers are being asked to deliver restoration measures, then the plans must be backed by new, dedicated funding outside of CAP — no shortfalls and no uncertainty.”

Mr Murphy also raised ongoing concerns around the principle that participation will be voluntary. “There is a lot of concern and distrust that this could gradually shift towards pressure through regulation or penalties, particularly if targets are not being met.”

“Farmers on designated land have been treated poorly, with promised funding not delivered and restrictions imposed on their land. There is a real fear among farmers that the same will happen under the Nature Restoration Regulation,” he said.

He concluded that Nature Restoration Regulation will only succeed, if dedicated funding outside CAP is provided and the Government work in genuine partnership with farmers to deliver a plan that is grounded in practical realities.